Hick's Law

The time it takes to make a decision increases with the number and complexity of choices.

The scenario: a SaaS pricing page. Every extra plan, toggle, and add-on the visitor must evaluate adds decision time — and past a point, they defer the decision entirely and leave.

What's wrong here? Six plans, ten feature bullets each, billing toggles, and a wall of add-ons. Visitors must compare ~60 data points before they can act. Most will postpone the decision — “I'll come back later” — and never do.
cloudmetric.io/pricing

Choose your plan

Monthly / Annual / Biennial / Usage-based / Per-seat / Volume-tiered

Nano

$5
  • 1 project
  • 500 events
  • 1 seat
  • Email support
  • 7-day history

Micro

$12
  • 3 projects
  • 2k events
  • 2 seats
  • Email support
  • 14-day history

Starter

$29
  • 5 projects
  • 10k events
  • 3 seats
  • Chat support
  • 30-day history

Growth

$59
  • 15 projects
  • 50k events
  • 10 seats
  • Chat support
  • 90-day history

Scale

$119
  • 40 projects
  • 250k events
  • 25 seats
  • Priority support
  • 1-year history

Enterprise

$—
  • Unlimited
  • Custom events
  • SSO & SLA
  • Dedicated CSM
  • Custom history
Customize with add-ons:

🔍 What changed

  • 6 plans → 3 plans; ~60 comparison points → ~12.
  • A recommended default (“Most popular”) gives undecided visitors a safe choice.
  • Add-ons and edge-case options moved behind a “Compare all features” link — progressive disclosure, not deletion.
  • One primary action per screen: the highlighted trial button.

💼 Explaining it to stakeholders

“Every option we show is a question we're asking the customer to answer before they can pay us. Cutting the visible choices from six to three doesn't remove functionality — it removes hesitation. Fewer, clearer choices means faster decisions and fewer abandoned pricing pages.”